Secure Shell Maintenance                                       D. Miller
Internet-Draft                                                   OpenSSH
Intended status: Standards Track                       S. Josefsson, Ed.
Expires: 12 August 2025                                  8 February 2025


            Lightweight Secure Shell (SSH) Signature Format
                    draft-josefsson-sshsig-format-00

Abstract

   This document describes a lightweight SSH Signature format that is
   compatible with SSH keys and wire formats.

About This Document

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   Status information for this document may be found at
   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-josefsson-sshsig-format/.

   Discussion of this document takes place on the SSHM Working Group
   mailing list (mailto:ssh@ietf.org), which is archived at
   https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ssh/.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://gitlab.com/jas/ietf-sshsig-format.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 12 August 2025.







Miller & Josefsson       Expires 12 August 2025                 [Page 1]

Internet-Draft                   SSHSIG                    February 2025


Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Conventions Used In This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Armored format  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Blob format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  Signed Data, of which the signature goes into the blob
           above . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   8.  Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   9.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6

1.  Introduction

   Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC4251] is a secure remote-login protocol.  It
   provides for an extensible variety of public key algorithms for
   identifying servers and users to one another.

   The SSH key and signature formats have found uses outside of the
   interactive online SSH protocol itself.  This document specify these
   formats.

   At present, only detached and armored signatures are supported.

2.  Conventions Used In This Document

   The descriptions of key and signature formats use the notation
   introduced in [RFC4251].







Miller & Josefsson       Expires 12 August 2025                 [Page 2]

Internet-Draft                   SSHSIG                    February 2025


   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

3.  Armored format

   The Armored SSH signatures consist of a header, a base64 encoded
   blob, and a footer.

   The header is the string "-----BEGIN SSH SIGNATURE-----" followed by
   a newline.  The footer is the string "-----END SSH SIGNATURE-----"
   immediately after a newline.

   The header MUST be present at the start of every signature.  Files
   containing the signature MUST start with the header.  Likewise, the
   footer MUST be present at the end of every signature.

   The base64 encoded blob SHOULD be broken up by newlines every 76
   characters.

   Example:

  -----BEGIN SSH SIGNATURE-----
  U1NIU0lHAAAAAQAAADMAAAALc3NoLWVkMjU1MTkAAAAgJKxoLBJBivUPNTUJUSslQTt2hD
  jozKvHarKeN8uYFqgAAAADZm9vAAAAAAAAAFMAAAALc3NoLWVkMjU1MTkAAABAKNC4IEbt
  Tq0Fb56xhtuE1/lK9H9RZJfON4o6hE9R4ZGFX98gy0+fFJ/1d2/RxnZky0Y7GojwrZkrHT
  FgCqVWAQ==
  -----END SSH SIGNATURE-----

4.  Blob format

   <CODE BEGINS>
   #define MAGIC_PREAMBLE "SSHSIG"
   #define SIG_VERSION    0x01

   byte[6] MAGIC_PREAMBLE
    uint32 SIG_VERSION
    string publickey
    string namespace
    string reserved
    string hash_algorithm
    string signature
   <CODE ENDS>






Miller & Josefsson       Expires 12 August 2025                 [Page 3]

Internet-Draft                   SSHSIG                    February 2025


   The publickey field MUST contain the serialisation of the public key
   used to make the signature using the usual SSH encoding rules, i.e
   [RFC4253], [RFC5656], [RFC8709], etc.

   Verifiers MUST reject signatures with versions greater than those
   they support.

   The purpose of the namespace value is to specify a unambiguous
   interpretation domain for the signature, e.g. file signing.  This
   prevents cross-protocol attacks caused by signatures intended for one
   intended domain being accepted in another.  The namespace value MUST
   NOT be the empty string.

   The reserved value is present to encode future information (e.g.
   tags) into the signature.  Implementations should ignore the reserved
   field if it is not empty.

   Data to be signed is first hashed with the specified hash_algorithm.
   This is done to limit the amount of data presented to the signature
   operation, which may be of concern if the signing key is held in
   limited or slow hardware or on a remote ssh-agent.  The supported
   hash algorithms are "sha256" and "sha512".

   The signature itself is made using the SSH signature algorithm and
   encoding rules for the chosen key type.  For RSA signatures, the
   signature algorithm must be "rsa-sha2-512" or "rsa-sha2-256" (i.e.
   not the legacy RSA-SHA1 "ssh-rsa").

   This blob is encoded as a string using the [RFC4253] encoding rules
   and base64 encoded to form the middle part of the armored signature.

5.  Signed Data, of which the signature goes into the blob above

   <CODE BEGINS>
   #define MAGIC_PREAMBLE "SSHSIG"

   byte[6] MAGIC_PREAMBLE
    string namespace
    string reserved
    string hash_algorithm
    string H(message)
   <CODE ENDS>

   The preamble is the six-byte sequence "SSHSIG".  It is included to
   ensure that manual signatures can never be confused with any message
   signed during SSH user or host authentication.





Miller & Josefsson       Expires 12 August 2025                 [Page 4]

Internet-Draft                   SSHSIG                    February 2025


   The reserved value is present to encode future information (e.g.
   tags) into the signature.  Implementations should ignore the reserved
   field if it is not empty.

   The data is concatenated and passed to the SSH signing function.

6.  IANA Considerations

   None

7.  Security Considerations

   The security considerations of all referenced specifications are
   inherited.

   Cryptographic algorithms and parameters are usually broken or
   weakened over time.  Implementers and users need to continously re-
   evaluate that cryptographic algorithms continue to provide the
   expected level of security.

   Implementations has to follow best practices to avoid security
   concerns, and users needs to continously re-evaulate implementations
   for security vulnerabilities.

8.  Acknowledgments

   The text in this document is from PROTOCOL.sshsig from OpenSSH which
   appears to have been contributed to by at least Sebastian Kinne,
   Damien Miller, Markus Friedl, HARUYAMA Seigo, and Pedro Martelletto.

9.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC4251]  Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
              Protocol Architecture", RFC 4251, DOI 10.17487/RFC4251,
              January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4251>.

   [RFC4253]  Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
              Transport Layer Protocol", RFC 4253, DOI 10.17487/RFC4253,
              January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4253>.







Miller & Josefsson       Expires 12 August 2025                 [Page 5]

Internet-Draft                   SSHSIG                    February 2025


   [RFC5656]  Stebila, D. and J. Green, "Elliptic Curve Algorithm
              Integration in the Secure Shell Transport Layer",
              RFC 5656, DOI 10.17487/RFC5656, December 2009,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5656>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC8709]  Harris, B. and L. Velvindron, "Ed25519 and Ed448 Public
              Key Algorithms for the Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol",
              RFC 8709, DOI 10.17487/RFC8709, February 2020,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8709>.

Authors' Addresses

   Damien Miller
   OpenSSH
   Email: djm@mindrot.org


   Simon Josefsson (editor)
   Email: simon@josefsson.org




























Miller & Josefsson       Expires 12 August 2025                 [Page 6]