patch-2.4.22 linux-2.4.22/arch/i386/math-emu/poly.h

• Lines: 76
• Date: 2003-08-25 04:44:39.000000000 -0700
• Orig file: linux-2.4.21/arch/i386/math-emu/poly.h
• Orig date: 2001-07-26 13:37:38.000000000 -0700

diff -urN linux-2.4.21/arch/i386/math-emu/poly.h linux-2.4.22/arch/i386/math-emu/poly.h
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 				      const unsigned long arg2)
 {
   int retval;
-  asm volatile ("mull %2; movl %%edx,%%eax" \
+  asm volatile ("mull %2; movl %%edx,%%eax; " \
 		:"=a" (retval) \
 		:"0" (arg1), "g" (arg2) \
 		:"dx");
@@ -75,11 +75,11 @@
 /* Add the 12 byte Xsig x2 to Xsig dest, with no checks for overflow. */
 static inline void add_Xsig_Xsig(Xsig *dest, const Xsig *x2)
 {
-  asm volatile ("movl %1,%%edi; movl %2,%%esi;
-                 movl (%%esi),%%eax; addl %%eax,(%%edi);
-                 movl 4(%%esi),%%eax; adcl %%eax,4(%%edi);
-                 movl 8(%%esi),%%eax; adcl %%eax,8(%%edi);"
-                 :"=g" (*dest):"g" (dest), "g" (x2)
+  asm volatile ("movl %1,%%edi; movl %2,%%esi; " \
+                 "movl (%%esi),%%eax; addl %%eax,(%%edi); " \
+                 "movl 4(%%esi),%%eax; adcl %%eax,4(%%edi); " \
+                 "movl 8(%%esi),%%eax; adcl %%eax,8(%%edi); " \
+                 :"=g" (*dest):"g" (dest), "g" (x2) \
                  :"ax","si","di");
 }
 
@@ -90,19 +90,19 @@
    problem, but keep fingers crossed! */
 static inline void add_two_Xsig(Xsig *dest, const Xsig *x2, long int *exp)
 {
-  asm volatile ("movl %2,%%ecx; movl %3,%%esi;
-                 movl (%%esi),%%eax; addl %%eax,(%%ecx);
-                 movl 4(%%esi),%%eax; adcl %%eax,4(%%ecx);
-                 movl 8(%%esi),%%eax; adcl %%eax,8(%%ecx);
-                 jnc 0f;
-		 rcrl 8(%%ecx); rcrl 4(%%ecx); rcrl (%%ecx)
-                 movl %4,%%ecx; incl (%%ecx)
-                 movl $1,%%eax; jmp 1f;
-                 0: xorl %%eax,%%eax;
-                 1:"
-		:"=g" (*exp), "=g" (*dest)
-		:"g" (dest), "g" (x2), "g" (exp)
-		:"cx","si","ax");
+  asm volatile ("movl %2,%%ecx; movl %3,%%esi; " \
+                 "movl (%%esi),%%eax; addl %%eax,(%%ecx); " \
+                 "movl 4(%%esi),%%eax; adcl %%eax,4(%%ecx); " \
+                 "movl 8(%%esi),%%eax; adcl %%eax,8(%%ecx); " \
+                 "jnc 0f; " \
+		 "rcrl 8(%%ecx); rcrl 4(%%ecx); rcrl (%%ecx); " \
+                 "movl %4,%%ecx; incl (%%ecx); " \
+                 "movl $1,%%eax; jmp 1f; " \
+                 "0: xorl %%eax,%%eax; " \
+                 "1: " \
+		:"=g" (*exp), "=g" (*dest) \
+		:"g" (dest), "g" (x2), "g" (exp) \
+		:"cx","si","ax"); 
 }
 
 
@@ -110,11 +110,11 @@
 /* This is faster in a loop on my 386 than using the "neg" instruction. */
 static inline void negate_Xsig(Xsig *x)
 {
-  asm volatile("movl %1,%%esi; "
-               "xorl %%ecx,%%ecx; "
-               "movl %%ecx,%%eax; subl (%%esi),%%eax; movl %%eax,(%%esi); "
-               "movl %%ecx,%%eax; sbbl 4(%%esi),%%eax; movl %%eax,4(%%esi); "
-               "movl %%ecx,%%eax; sbbl 8(%%esi),%%eax; movl %%eax,8(%%esi); "
+  asm volatile("movl %1,%%esi; " \
+               "xorl %%ecx,%%ecx; " \
+               "movl %%ecx,%%eax; subl (%%esi),%%eax; movl %%eax,(%%esi); " \
+               "movl %%ecx,%%eax; sbbl 4(%%esi),%%eax; movl %%eax,4(%%esi); " \
+               "movl %%ecx,%%eax; sbbl 8(%%esi),%%eax; movl %%eax,8(%%esi); " \
                :"=g" (*x):"g" (x):"si","ax","cx");
 }