Internet Engineering Task Force D. Farinacci Internet-Draft lispers.net Intended status: Standards Track L. Iannone, Ed. Expires: 12 June 2025 Huawei 9 December 2024 LISP Distinguished Name Encoding draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-17 Abstract This documents defines how to use the Address Family Identifier (AFI) 17 "Distinguished Names" in LISP. Distinguished Names can be used either in Endpoint Identifiers (EID) records or Routing Locators (RLOC) records in LISP control messages to convey additional information. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 12 June 2025. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 1] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Distinguished Name Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. Mapping System Lookups for Distinguished Name EIDs . . . . . 5 5. Example Use-Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6. Name Collision Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9. Sample LISP Distinguished Name (DN) Deployment Experience . . 6 9.1. DNs to Advertise Specific Device Roles or Functions . . . 6 9.2. DNs to Drive xTR On-Boarding Procedures . . . . . . . . . 7 9.3. DNs for NAT-Traversal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9.4. DNs for Self-Documenting RLOC Names . . . . . . . . . . . 8 9.5. DNs used as EID Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Appendix A. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Appendix B. Document Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 B.1. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-17 . . . . . . . 10 B.2. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-16 . . . . . . . 10 B.3. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-15 . . . . . . . 10 B.4. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-14 . . . . . . . 11 B.5. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-13 . . . . . . . 11 B.6. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-12 . . . . . . . 11 B.7. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-11 . . . . . . . 11 B.8. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-10 . . . . . . . 11 B.9. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-09 . . . . . . . 11 B.10. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08 . . . . . . . 11 B.11. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-07 . . . . . . . 12 B.12. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-06 . . . . . . . 12 B.13. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-05 . . . . . . . 12 B.14. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-04 . . . . . . . 12 B.15. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-03 . . . . . . . 12 B.16. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-02 . . . . . . . 12 B.17. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-01 . . . . . . . 13 B.18. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-00 . . . . . . . 13 Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 2] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 B.19. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-15 . . . . 13 B.20. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-14 . . . . 13 B.21. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-13 . . . . 13 B.22. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-12 . . . . 13 B.23. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-11 . . . . 13 B.24. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-10 . . . . 14 B.25. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-09 . . . . 14 B.26. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-08 . . . . 14 B.27. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-07 . . . . 14 B.28. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-06 . . . . 14 B.29. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-05 . . . . 14 B.30. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-04 . . . . 14 B.31. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-03 . . . . 14 B.32. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-02 . . . . 15 B.33. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-01 . . . . 15 B.34. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-00 . . . . 15 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 1. Introduction The LISP architecture and protocols ([RFC9300], [RFC9301]) introduces two new numbering spaces, Endpoint Identifiers (EIDs) and Routing Locators (RLOCs). To provide flexibility for current and future applications, these values can be encoded in LISP control messages using a general syntax that includes Address Family Identifier (AFI). The length of addresses encoded in EID and RLOC records can be easily determined by the AFI field, as the size of the address is implicit in its AFI value. For instance, for AFI = 1, which is IP version 4, the address length is known to be 4 octets. However, AFI 17 "Distinguished Name", is a variable length value, so the length cannot be determined solely from the AFI value 17. This document defines a termination character, an 8-bit value of 0 to be used as a string terminator so the length can be determined. LISP Distinguished Names are useful when encoded either in EID- Records or RLOC-records in LISP control messages. As EIDs, they can be registered in the mapping system to find resources, services, or simply used as a self-documenting feature that accompany other address specific EIDs. As RLOCs, Distinguished Names, along with RLOC specific addresses and parameters, can be used as labels to identify equipment type, location, or any self-documenting string a registering device desires to convey. The Distinguished Name field in this document has no relationship to the similarly named field in the Public-Key Infrastructure using X.509 (PKIX) specifications [RFC5280]. Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 3] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 2. Definition of Terms Address Family Identifier (AFI): a term used to describe an address encoding in a packet. An address family is currently defined for IPv4 or IPv6 addresses. See [IANA-ADDRESS-FAMILY-REGISTRY] for details on other types of information that can be AFI encoded. 3. Distinguished Name Format An AFI=17 Distinguished Name is encoded as: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | AFI = 17 | NULL Terminated US-ASCII ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ String | ~ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ The variable length string of characters are encoded as a NULL (0x00) terminated US-ASCII character-set as defined in [RFC3629], where UTF-8 has the characteristic of preserving the full US-ASCII range. NULL character MUST be appear only once in the string and MUST be at the end of the string. When Distinguished Names are encoded for EIDs, the EID Mask-Len length of the EIDs as they appear in EID-Records for all LISP control messages [RFC9301] is the length of the string in bits (including the terminating NULL 0x00 octet). Where Distinguished Names are encoded anywhere else (i.e., nested in LCAF encodings [RFC8060]), then a explicit length field can be used to indicate the length of the ASCII string in octets, the length field MUST include the NULL 0 octet. The string MUST still be NULL terminated. If a NULL 0 octet appears before the end of the octet field, i.e., the NULL octet appears before the the last position in the octet fields, then the string MAY be accepted and the octets after the NULL 0 octet MUST NOT be used as part of the octet string. If the octet after the AFI field is the NULL 0 octet, the string is a NULL string and MUST be accepted. That is, an AFI=17 encoded string MUST be at least 1 octet in length. Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 4] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 4. Mapping System Lookups for Distinguished Name EIDs Distinguished Name EID lookups MUST carry as an EID Mask-Len length equal to the length of the name string. This instructs the mapping system to do either an exact match or longest match lookup. If the Distinguished Name EID is registered with the same length as the length in a Map-Request, the Map-Server (when configured for proxy Map-Replying) returns an exact match lookup with the same EID Mask-Len length. If a less specific name is registered, then the Map-Server returns the registered name with the registered EID Mask- Len length. For example, if the registered EID name is "ietf" with EID Mask-Len of 40 bits (the length of string "ietf" plus the null octet is 5 octets), and a Map-Request is received for EID name "ietf.lisp" with an EID Mask-Len of 80 bits, the Map-Server will return EID "ietf" with length of 40 bits. 5. Example Use-Cases This section identifies three specific use-cases examples for the Distinguished Name format. Two are used for an EID encoding and one for an RLOC-record encoding. When storing public keys in the mapping system, as in [I-D.ietf-lisp-ecdsa-auth], a well-known format for a public-key hash can be encoded as a Distinguished Name. When street location to GPS coordinate mappings exist in the mapping system, as in [I-D.ietf-lisp-geo], the street location can be a free form UTF-8 ASCII representation (with whitespace characters) encoded as a Distinguished Name. An RLOC that describes an Ingress or Egress Tunnel Router (xTR) behind a NAT device can be identified by its router name, as in [I-D.farinacci-lisp-lispers-net-nat]. In this case, Distinguished Name encoding is used in NAT Info-Request messages after the EID-prefix field of the message. 6. Name Collision Considerations When a Distinguished Name encoding is used to format an EID, the uniqueness and allocation concerns are no different than registering IPv4 or IPv6 EIDs to the mapping system. See [RFC9301] for more details. Also, the use-case documents specified in Section 5 of this specification provide allocation recommendations for their specific uses. Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 5] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 It is RECOMMENDED that each use-case register their Distinguished Names with a unique Instance-ID. For any use-cases which require different uses for Distinguish Names within an Instance-ID MUST define their own Instance-ID and structure syntax for the name registered to the Mapping System. See the encoding procedures in [I-D.ietf-lisp-vpn] for an example. 7. Security Considerations Distinguished Names are used in mappings that are part of the LISP control plane and may be encoded using LCAF, as such security considerations of [RFC9301] and [RFC8060] apply. 8. IANA Considerations The code-point value in this specification, namely AFI 17, is already allocated in [IANA-ADDRESS-FAMILY-REGISTRY]. 9. Sample LISP Distinguished Name (DN) Deployment Experience Practical implementations of the LISP Distinguished Name specification have been running in production networks for some time. The following sections provide some examples of its usage and lessons gathered out of this experience. 9.1. DNs to Advertise Specific Device Roles or Functions In a practical implementation of [I-D.ietf-lisp-site-external-connectivity] on LISP deployments, routers running as Proxy Egress Tunnel Routers (Proxy-ETRs) register their role with the Mapping System in order to attract traffic destined for external networks. Practical implementations of this functionality make use of a Distinguished Name as an EID to identify the Proxy-ETR role in a Map-Registration. In this case all Proxy-ETRs supporting this function register a common Distinguished Name together with their own offered locator. The Mapping-System aggregates the locators received from all Proxy- ETRs as a common locator-set that is associated with this DN EID. The Distinguished Name in this case serves as a common reference EID that can be requested (or subscribed as per [RFC9437]) to dynamically gather this Proxy-ETR list as specified in the LISP Site External Connectivity document. The use of a Distinguished Name in this case provides descriptive information about the role being registered and allows the Mapping System to form locator-sets associated to specific role. These locator-sets can be distributed on-demand based on using the shared Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 6] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 DN as EID. It also allows the network admin and the Mapping System to selectively choose what roles and functions can be registered and distributed to the rest of the participants in the network. 9.2. DNs to Drive xTR On-Boarding Procedures Following the LISP reliable transport [I-D.ietf-lisp-map-server-reliable-transport], ETRs that plan to switch to using reliable transport to hold registrations first need to start with traditional UDP registrations. The UDP registration allows the Map-Server to perform basic authentication of the ETR and create the necessary state to permit the reliable transport session to be established (e.g., establish a passive open on TCP port 4342 and add the ETR RLOC to the list allowed to establish a session). In the basic implementation of this process, the ETRs need to wait until local mappings are available and ready to be registered with the Mapping System. Furthermore, when the mapping system is distributed, the ETR requires having one specific mapping ready to be registered with each one of the relevant Map-Servers. This process may delay the onboarding of ETRs with the Mapping System so that they can switch to using reliable transport. This can also lead to generating unnecessary signaling as a reaction to certain triggers like local port flaps and device failures. The use of dedicated name registrations allows driving this initial ETR on-boarding on the Mapping System as a deterministic process that does not depend on the availability of other mappings. It also provides more stability to the reliable transport session to survive through transient events. In practice, LISP deployments use dedicated Distinguished Names that are registered as soon as xTRs come online with all the necessary Map-Servers in the Mapping System. The mapping with the dedicated DN together with the RLOCs of each Egress Tunnel Router (ETR) in the locator-set is used to drive the initial UDP registration and also to keep the reliable transport state stable through network condition changes. On the Map-Server, these DN registrations facilitate setting up the necessary state to onboard new ETRs rapidly and in a more deterministic manner. 9.3. DNs for NAT-Traversal The open source lispers.net NAT-Traversal implementation [I-D.farinacci-lisp-lispers-net-nat] has had 10 years of deployment experience using Distinguished Names for documenting xTRs versus Re- encapsulating Tunnel Router (RTRs) as they appear in a locator-set. Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 7] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 9.4. DNs for Self-Documenting RLOC Names The open source lispers.net implementation has had 10 years of self- documenting RLOC names in production and pilot environments. The RLOC name is encoded with the RLOC address in Distinguished Name format. 9.5. DNs used as EID Names The open source lispers.net implementation has had 10 years of deployment experience allowing xTRs to register EIDs as Distinguished Names. The LISP Mapping System can be used as a DNS proxy for Name- to-EID-address or Name-to-RLOC-address mappings. The implementation also supports Name-to-Public-Key mappings to provide key management features in [I-D.ietf-lisp-ecdsa-auth]. 10. References 10.1. Normative References [IANA-ADDRESS-FAMILY-REGISTRY] IANA, "IANA Address Family Numbers Registry", https://www.iana.org/assignments/address-family-numbers/, December 2024. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, DOI 10.17487/RFC3629, November 2003, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [RFC9300] Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., Lewis, D., and A. Cabellos, Ed., "The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)", RFC 9300, DOI 10.17487/RFC9300, October 2022, . [RFC9301] Farinacci, D., Maino, F., Fuller, V., and A. Cabellos, Ed., "Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Control Plane", RFC 9301, DOI 10.17487/RFC9301, October 2022, . Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 8] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 [RFC9437] Rodriguez-Natal, A., Ermagan, V., Cabellos, A., Barkai, S., and M. Boucadair, "Publish/Subscribe Functionality for the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)", RFC 9437, DOI 10.17487/RFC9437, August 2023, . 10.2. Informative References [I-D.farinacci-lisp-lispers-net-nat] Farinacci, D., "lispers.net LISP NAT-Traversal Implementation Report", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-farinacci-lisp-lispers-net-nat-08, 17 June 2024, . [I-D.ietf-lisp-ecdsa-auth] Farinacci, D. and E. Nordmark, "LISP Control-Plane ECDSA Authentication and Authorization", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-lisp-ecdsa-auth-13, 18 August 2024, . [I-D.ietf-lisp-geo] Farinacci, D., "LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-lisp-geo-08, 21 July 2024, . [I-D.ietf-lisp-map-server-reliable-transport] Venkatachalapathy, B., Portoles-Comeras, M., Lewis, D., Kouvelas, I., and C. Cassar, "LISP Map Server Reliable Transport", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- lisp-map-server-reliable-transport-05, 4 November 2024, . [I-D.ietf-lisp-site-external-connectivity] Jain, P., Moreno, V., and S. Hooda, "LISP Site External Connectivity", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft- ietf-lisp-site-external-connectivity-01, 24 September 2024, . Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 9] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 [I-D.ietf-lisp-vpn] Moreno, V. and D. Farinacci, "LISP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft- ietf-lisp-vpn-12, 19 September 2023, . [RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008, . [RFC8060] Farinacci, D., Meyer, D., and J. Snijders, "LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF)", RFC 8060, DOI 10.17487/RFC8060, February 2017, . Appendix A. Acknowledgments The author would like to thank the LISP WG for their review and acceptance of this draft. And a special thank you goes to Marc Portoles for moving this document through the process and providing deployment experience samples. Appendix B. Document Change Log B.1. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-17 * Submitted 9 December 2024. * Refined wording for explicit length usage. B.2. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-16 * Submitted 6 December 2024. * Fixed wording for explicit length usage. B.3. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-15 * Submitted 3 December 2024. * Luigi Iannone joined as editor. * Re-wording some text for clarification and address Paul Wouters concerns. * Updated security consideration section. Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 10] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 * Updated abstract. * Moved some references to avoid downref. B.4. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-14 * Submitted August 2024. * Use Paul Wouters suggestion to draw packet format for AFI=17 encoding in Section 3. B.5. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-13 * Submitted August 2024. * Use Paul Wouters referene suggestion for RFC3629 to point ASCII references in this document to UTF-8. B.6. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-12 * Submitted August 2024. * Made changes based on comments from Mahesh Jethanandani and Paul Wouters during IESG review. B.7. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-11 * Submitted August 2024. * Fix typo found by Erik Kline. B.8. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-10 * Submitted August 2024. * Change to "EID mask-len" per Roman Danyliw's comments. B.9. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-09 * Submitted July 2024. * Added editorial suggestions from Acee Lindem. B.10. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08 * Submitted June 2024. * Made changes to reflect AD Jim Guichard's comments. Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 11] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 B.11. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-07 * Submitted May 2024. * Changed document status to "Proposed Standard" and some rewording per Alberto for the pETR use-case section. B.12. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-06 * Submitted April 2024. * Add Deployment Experience section for standards track requirements. * Update references. B.13. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-05 * Submitted December 2023. * Update IANA AFI reference. B.14. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-04 * Submitted December 2023. * More comments from Alberto. Change to standard spellings throughout. * Add RFC 2119 boilerplate. * Update reference RFC1700 to RFC3232. B.15. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-03 * Submitted December 2023. * Address comments from Alberto, document shepherd. * Update references. B.16. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-02 * Submitted August 2023. * Update references and document expiry timer. Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 12] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 B.17. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-01 * Submitted February 2023. * Update references and document expiry timer. * Change 68**.bis references to proposed RFC references. B.18. Changes to draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-00 * Submitted August 2022. * Move individual submission to LISP WG document. B.19. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-15 * Submitted July 2022. * Added more clarity text about how using VPNs (instance-ID encoding) addresses name collisions from multiple use-cases. * Update references and document expiry timer. B.20. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-14 * Submitted May 2022. * Update references and document expiry timer. B.21. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-13 * Submitted November 2021. * Update references and document expiry timer. B.22. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-12 * Submitted May 2021. * Update references and document expiry timer. B.23. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-11 * Submitted November 2020. * Made changes to reflect working group comments. * Update references and document expiry timer. Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 13] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 B.24. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-10 * Submitted August 2020. * Update references and document expiry timer. B.25. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-09 * Submitted March 2020. * Update references and document expiry timer. B.26. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-08 * Submitted September 2019. * Update references and document expiry timer. B.27. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-07 * Submitted March 2019. * Update referenes and document expiry timer. B.28. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-06 * Submitted September 2018. * Update document expiry timer. B.29. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-05 * Submitted March 2018. * Update document expiry timer. B.30. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-04 * Submitted September 2017. * Update document expiry timer. B.31. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-03 * Submitted March 2017. * Update document expiry timer. Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 14] Internet-Draft LISP Distinguished Name Encoding December 2024 B.32. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-02 * Submitted October 2016. * Add a comment that the distinguished-name encoding is restricted to ASCII character encodings only. B.33. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-01 * Submitted October 2016. * Update document timer. B.34. Changes to draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-00 * Initial draft submitted April 2016. Authors' Addresses Dino Farinacci lispers.net San Jose, CA United States of America Email: farinacci@gmail.com Luigi Iannone (editor) Huawei Technologies France S.A.S.U. 18, Quai du Point du Jour 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt France Email: luigi.iannone@huawei.com Farinacci & Iannone Expires 12 June 2025 [Page 15]