Internet Engineering Task Force                                  Lu, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                                   M. Chen
Intended status: Informational                                     L. Su
Expires: 21 April 2025                                      China Mobile
                                                         18 October 2024


A mechanism of security monitoring and management for service resources
               in Computing-Aware Traffic Steering (CATS)
                     draft-lu-cats-smam-security-00

Abstract

   The goal is to This draft proposes a mechanism to realize monitoring
   and management of service resources.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 April 2025.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.





Lu, et al.                Expires 21 April 2025                 [Page 1]

Internet-Draft                SMAM for CATS                 October 2024


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Problem statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Framework and Components  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Workflow  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     4.1.  Overview  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     4.2.  Collection of security information  . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     4.3.  Processing of security information  . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     4.4.  Service decision-making based on security information . .   6
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6

1.  Introduction

   As described in [I-D.ietf-cats-usecases-requirements], traffic
   steering that takes into account both the computing resource metric
   and network metric would improve the QoE of several services, e.g.,
   AR/VR and intelligent transportation.  But when executing services,
   efficiency is not the only factor to consider.  Security requirements
   are important for users, service providers and network providers,
   such as following security requirements:

1. The services should not be interrupted abnormally, and data of services should not be leaked or unauthorized access;

2. The network should run stably and is not subject to attacks from service resources;

3. The service resources are prevented from being attacked by other resources.

   Many resolutions need to be designed and applyed to fully meet
   security requirements above.  But a basic resolution is to monitor
   and discover corrupted service resources and limit them from
   providing services and interact with network components as well as
   other service resources, and more secure service resources should be
   selected under same conditions.  This draft proposes a mechanism to
   realize monitoring and management of service resources.

2.  Problem statement

   Service resources face kinds of attacks from inside and outside.
   Successful attacks may bring security risks for services, such as
   service unavailable, service data stolen etc, and service resources
   may become attack tools to interfere activities of other computing
   resources and functional components in CATS if they are manipulated
   maliciously.  The more vulnerable the resource, the greater the
   likelihood of being breached.  And when service resources have been
   breached, they will be threats in network.



Lu, et al.                Expires 21 April 2025                 [Page 2]

Internet-Draft                SMAM for CATS                 October 2024


   For protecting service availability, security of services and
   maintaining network stability, computing resources in CATS should be
   in security status and services should run on reliable resources.  So
   there should be a mechanism to monitor security status of service
   resources and discover the resources that are likely to be breached
   and those that have already been breached in CATS.  Then different
   policies can be applyed for above service resources such as excluding
   the service resources from CATS or reduce usage of them.

3.  Framework and Components

   In [I-D.ldbc-cats-framework], a CATS framework for computing-aware
   traffic steering according to computing metrics of service resources
   and network metrics is proposed.  In this draft, the new functional
   component C-SeMA is introduced based on the existing CATS framework.

   The CATS Security Metric Agent(C-SeMA) is responsible for collecting
   security information of computing resources that used to carry
   service instances.  Computing resources could be servers, virtual
   machines or containers.  Details of security information are listed
   in 5.2.

   The C-SeMA gathers the security information and decides the security
   status of the computing resources, then generates security policy
   according to the security status of computing resources and sends it
   to C-PS.  C-PS could adjust resource selection policy according to
   the security policy.

4.  Workflow

4.1.  Overview

   Figure 2 shows the main workflow of monitoring and management of
   computing resources.  Two stages are included in the workflow.  In
   stage 1, C-SeMA acquire security information from computing resources
   or security functions.  In stage 2, security policies will be
   generated according to security information and will be sent to C-PS.
   In stage 3, C-PS can select service nodes according to the security
   policies.












Lu, et al.                Expires 21 April 2025                 [Page 3]

Internet-Draft                SMAM for CATS                 October 2024


+-----------------+          +----------------+           +---------------+
|sefunction/      |          |                |           |               |
|service resources|      -   |    C-SeMA      |           |      C-PS     |
+--------+--------+          +--------+-------+           +--------+------+
         <----------------------------+                            |
         |                            |                            |
         |requirements of             |                            |
         |security metrics            |                            |
         |                            |                            |
         +---------------------------->                            |
         |security                    |                            |
         |information                 |                            |
         |                            |                            |
         |                     processing of                       |
         |                     security                            |
         |                     information                         |
         |                            ++---------------------------+
         |                            |         security policy    |
         |                            |                            |
         |                            |                         service
         |                            |                     decision-making
         |                            |                            |

                                Figure2: overview of workflow

4.2.  Collection of security information

   C-SeMA need to collect security capability information and security
   status information of computing resources.  Security capability
   information indicates the security capabilities that are depolyed for
   protecting computing resources and services running on them from
   attacks.  Security status information including predefined dynamic
   security metrics of computing resources, such as abnormal traffic,
   adnormal behaviors, and vulnerability situation etc.  C-SeMA need to
   distribute requirements of security metrics to computing resources or
   security functions.

   C-SeMA collects security information from computing resources or
   security functions deployed in service sites or network.  Different
   collection methods can be used, such as C-SeMA collects security
   information periodically or security function push the information
   when security status changes.

   Security information should be associated with a specific computing
   resource and is associated with service instances by computing
   resources.  Table 1 shows the examples of security information for
   service resources.




Lu, et al.                Expires 21 April 2025                 [Page 4]

Internet-Draft                SMAM for CATS                 October 2024


   +--------------+-----------------+---------------------+
   | Types of     |    Security     |       Details       |
   | security     |    metrics      |                     |
   | information  |                 |                     |
   +--------------+-----------------+---------------------+
   |              |   Security      |                     |
   |  Security    |   capabilities  |  Such as X-san      |
   |  capability  |   of computing  |  , IPS and IDS etc  |
   |              |   resources     |                     |
   +--------------+-----------------+---------------------+
   |              |                 |  Current            |
   |              |   Vulnerability |  vulnerabilities in |
   |              |   information   |  computing resources|
   |              +-----------------+---------------------+
   |              |                 |  Current virus      |
   |              |   Virus         |  in computing       |
   |              |   information   |  resources          |
   |              +-----------------+---------------------+
   |   Security   |                 |  Attack events      |
   |   status     |   Attack        |  faced by computing |
   |              |   information   |  resources          |
   |              +-----------------+---------------------+
   |              |                 | Abnormal behavior   |
   |              |                 | information         |
   |              |                 | of service resources|
   |              |   Abnormal      | such as frequent    |
   |              |   behavior      | submission of data, |
   |              |   information   | single submission   |
   |              |                 | of large amounts of |
   |              |                 | data etc            |
   +--------------+-----------------+---------------------+
           Table 1: examples of security information

4.3.  Processing of security information

   C-SeMA processes the received security information and determines the
   corresponding security policies for specific computing resources or
   service instances according to predefined decision rules.

   Two examples of decision rules are as following:

1. Rule 1: Predefine rule of value assignment and weighs of every security metric. Then assign values to security metrics according to received security information and the rules. And use method of weighting to compute the final security value. Security policies will be determined according to the final value;

2. Rule 2: Set trigger rules of every kind of policy, such as if high risk vulnerabilities are found in computing resources, then priority of the corresponding resources should be reduced.

   Specific decision logic is out of the scope of this draft.

   The policies include but not limited to the following types:



Lu, et al.                Expires 21 April 2025                 [Page 5]

Internet-Draft                SMAM for CATS                 October 2024


   1 Suggests to prohibit using the computing resources;

   2 Suggests to prohibit using the service instances;

   3 Suggests to reduce the priority of the computing resources;

   4 Suggests to reduce the priority of the service instances;

   5 Suggests to prioritize the computing resources;

   6 Suggests to enable the computing resources;

   7 None.

4.4.  Service decision-making based on security information

   C-SeMA submits the policies for specific computing resources or
   service instances to C-PS.  C-PS could take these policies as
   references and adjust selection policies when conducting service
   decision-making.  According to different policies, operations of C-PS
   include but not limited to the following types:

1. If C-SeMA suggests to prohibit specific computing resources/instances, C-PS excludes these computing resources/instances from alternative lists;

2. If C-SeMA suggests to reduce the priority of specific computing resources/instances, C-PS selects other computing resources/instances to provide service under the same network and computing conditions;

3. If C-SeMA suggests to prioritize specific computing resources/instances, C-PS selects these computing resources/instances to provide service among computing resources/instances with same network and computing conditions;

4. If C-SeMA suggests to enable specific computing resources, C-PS puts them into alternative lists;

5.  IANA Considerations

   This memo includes no request to IANA.

6.  Security Considerations

   TBD

Authors' Addresses

   Li Lu (editor)
   China Mobile
   BeiJing
   China
   Email: luli@chinamobile.com






Lu, et al.                Expires 21 April 2025                 [Page 6]

Internet-Draft                SMAM for CATS                 October 2024


   Meiling Chen
   China Mobile
   BeiJing
   China
   Email: chenmeiling@chinamobile.com


   Li Su
   China Mobile
   BeiJing
   China
   Email: suli@chinamobile.com







































Lu, et al.                Expires 21 April 2025                 [Page 7]